Arris Surfboard SB6190 Vs Netgear CM700

In this article, we will compare two modems that are popular in the market because of their excellent performance, Arris Surfboard SB6190 vs Netgear CM700. They do have similarities in their features and specifications, but there are also differences that may make you prefer one model over the other.

Continue reading below to find out more about:
– The design and dimensions of each modem
– The available connectivity options on each modem
– The features and capabilities of each model
– The performance of Arris Surfboard SB6190 vs Netgear CM700
– The warranty that comes with each model
– Which modem that is generally more recommended

Design
Perhaps the very first thing that you need to consider when choosing between Arris Surfboard SB6190 and Netgear CM700 is whether you want your modem to be placed on your desk or to be mounted on the wall. Arris Surfboard SB6190 has wall-mount slots, while Netgear CM700 doesn’t. See also: Arris Surfboard SB6190 vs SB6183.

Arris Surfboard SB6190 has a slightly larger overall size. It measures 5.2 inches long, 6.6 inches high, and 1.7 inches thick. The weight is about 0.55 lbs. It is actually available in two color choices, black and white. It has a hard plastic casing with vent holes on the sides. There are icon-shaped light indicators on the front and connector ports on the rear.

The distinctive feature of Arris Surfboard SB6190 in terms of design is the wall-mount slots. You can mount this modem directly on the wall instead of using brackets. You can also just put it on a desk or shelf, if you prefer so.

Netgear CM700, on the other hand, actually has a more compact physicality. This modem measures 5 inches long, 5 inches high, and 2.1 inches thick. It comes with a tough plastic casing with a black finish. It has green light indicators on one side and connector ports on the other side.

However, this modem doesn’t have wall-mount slots. Instead, Netgear CM700 has an integrated footstand, so you can easily keep it standing on a desk or shelf. If you really want to mount it on the wall, you need to use some wall brackets.

Connectivity
In terms of connectivity, Arris Surfboard SB6190 vs Netgear CM700 are similar. Both of them are ‘just’ cable modems. They don’t have any router functionality. So, if you want to provide Internet access for the entire home, you need to connect either Arris Surfboard SB6190 or Netgear CM700 to a wired or wireless router.

Each of the two modems comes with a power port, a coaxial port, and a Gigabit Ethernet port. The power port is quite self-explanatory. The coaxial port is where you should plug the cable from your Internet service provider. Meanwhile, the Gigabit Ethernet port is used for connecting the modem to your computer or router.

Both modems are compatible with most operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. They should be able to work with most modems as well, both wired and wireless models. They can work with most popular Internet cable services, such as Comcast Xfinity, Time Warner, Charter, Brighthouse Networks, Mediacom, Suddenlink, and Cox. However, they are not compatible with CenturyLink, AT&T, Verizone, and bundled voice services.

Features
One distinctive feature of Arris Surfboard SB6190 vs Netgear CM700 is the existence of a power button. Arris Surfboard SB6190 doesn’t have a power button, so when you want to turn off and on the modem, you need to unplug and plug the power cable. This is a bit inconvenient, especially if the power outlet is difficult to reach. On the other hand, Netgear CM700 has an on/off switch on the rear panel, so the operation is much more convenient.

Arris Surfboard SB6190 does not have a built-in quality of service (QoS) functionality. QoS is a feature for controlling the amount of bandwidth that is given to each device in the network. An advanced QoS feature can prioritize the bandwidth for specific devices and activities, hence ensuring optimum performance for every need. Arris Surfboard SB6190 can work very well with the QoS on the connected router, if the router does have one.

Netgear CM700 is said to have an advanced QoS functionality. So, when serving multiple devices through a router, it may be able to split the available bandwidth efficiently. However, you will probably just use the QoS feature on the router. Most routers are smarter and more advanced in bandwidth control and prioritization.

Performance
Performance-wise, Arris Surfboard SB6190 and Netgear CM700 should be similar. Each of them comes with the 32×8 channel bonding technology. In other words, each of these modems has 32 download channels and 8 upload channels that can be used simultaneously. They both offer the best download performance and superior upload speeds.

The channel bonding technology enables a modem to use multiple channels when downloading or uploading data packets. As a result, the overall performance can be significantly increased. On paper, Arris Surfboard SB6190 and Netgear CM700 can reach download speeds up to 1.4 Gbps and upload speeds up to 262 Mbps.

However, keep in mind that there will be a bottleneck effect caused by the Ethernet port. Currently, the Ethernet port only has a maximum bandwidth of 1.0 Gbps. Although the modem actually supports higher speeds, the amount of data that can be transferred at a time is limited to that value. Even so, Arris Surfboard SB6190 and Netgear CM700 still offer impressive performance. They will let you enjoy the best performance of your Internet service.

Warranty
Arris Surfboard SB6190 is backed by a longer warranty. This modem has a 2-year limited warranty that covers any defect in the material and workmanship. After all, the products from the company are always known for their superior durability and longevity.

Netgear CM700 unfortunately has a shorter warranty. The modem is backed by a 1-year limited warranty. Complimentary technical support from the authorized dealer is provided for 90 days since the purchase date.

Arris Surfboard SB6190 Vs Netgear CM700

Arris Surfboard SB6190Netgear CM700
BrandArrisNetgear
Key features- Approved on Comcast Xfinity, Spectrum (Charter, Time Warner, Brighthouse Networks), Cox, Mediacom, Suddenlink and most other US Cable Internet Providers. NOT compatible with Verizon, AT&T or Centurylink. REQUIRES Internet Service - 32 Download and 8 Upload Bonded Channels capable of up to 1.4 Gbps download and 262 upload speeds. Recommended for Internet Plans 250 Mbps and above- Support Cable Internet Service plans up to 500 Mbps. Separate router required for WiFi. 32x8 channel bonding . - DOCSIS 3.0 up to 32x faster download speeds than DOCSIS 2.0 - ELIMINTE MONTHLY CABLE MODEM RENTAL FEES - Up to $120 per year
Price

Customer Rating4.0 out of 5.0 stars4.2 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Conclusion
These two models have their own pros and cons. In the end, Arris Surfboard SB6190 is more recommended because it has a better design and longer warranty. It can be mounted directly on the wall. The warranty goes for 2 years. The performance is truly great, as it has 32×8 channel bonding.

Netgear CM500 Vs CM700

When it comes to modems and routers, Netgear is one renowned brand. Its products have been trusted in many homes, offices, and public spots. In this article, we will discuss about the comparison between two modems that are popularly used in homes, Netgear CM500 vs CM700. What is the difference between the two models? Which one is better?

Continue reading below to learn more about:
– The size and weight of each model
– The available connectivity options on each model
– The distinctive features of Netgear CM500 and Netgear CM700
– The performance of Netgear CM500 vs CM700
– What platforms and services that are compatible with them
– Which modem that is more recommended for the money

Dimensions
Well, the first obvious difference between Netgear CM500 vs CM700 is their dimensions. This is something to keep in your mind because both of these modems can’t be wall-mounted. They have integrated foot stands. Whichever model that you choose, you need to put the modem on a flat surface, such as on your desk, on a side table, or on a shelf. See also: Netgear CM500 vs CM400.

Netgear CM500 is slightly taller. It measures 4.88 inches wide, 2.36 inches thick, and 7.28 inches tall (124mm x 60mm x 185mm). The weight is about 0.62 lbs (0.28 kg). The green light indicators are on one side, while the connection ports are on the other side. The whole housing has a black glossy finish which looks simple yet stylish.

Netgear CM700 is not as tall, but it is thicker and wider. It measures 5.2 inches wide, 2.7 inches thick, and 6.6 inches tall (132mm x 69mm x 167mm). It weighs approximately 0.55 lbs (0.25 kg). The overall design is slightly different. The sides are all curved and almost pointy. There is a diamond-like pattern on the front surface. Nevertheless, there are also light indicators on one side and the connection ports are right on the other side.

Connectivity
These two models have similar connectivity options. Netgear CM500 and Netgear CM700 are only modems; they don’t have any routing capability. So, if you want to provide Internet access not only to one computer but also to other devices in your home, you need to pair the modem with an Ethernet or Wi-Fi router.

On Netgear CM500, the topmost connector is the power port. Then, there is the Gigabit Ethernet port. You need to plug the included Ethernet cable to this port, and connect the other end to your computer or router. The bottom most connector is the coaxial port, which needs to be connected to your ISP’s cable. This model is designed for DOCSIS 3.0 services, but it is backward-compatible with DOCSIS 2.0 networks.

Similarly, Netgear CM700 also has a power port, an Ethernet port, and a coaxial port. It is just the layout that differs. On this model, the topmost connector is the Ethernet port. In the middle, there is the coaxial port. The bottom most connector is the power port. Netgear CM700 also supports DOCSIS 3.0 and is backward-compatible with DOCSIS 2.0.

Features
There are some notable differences between Netgear CM500 vs CM700 in terms of features. The differences are the on/off switch and the QoS capability.

Netgear CM500 does not have any on/off switch. There is just a small reset button, which you can use when there is a network issue that you can’t solve. The reset button will return the device to the default condition. Since there isn’t any on/off switch, you need to unplug the power cord to turn off the modem. This is quite inconvenient.

Actually, Netgear CM500 has the Advanced QoS feature. So, this modem is already able to handle multiple devices at the same time. The Advanced QoS feature will split the bandwidth accordingly and prioritize certain activities and devices. However, it is not really customizable.

Netgear CM700 is equipped with an on/off switch, in addition to the reset button. The on/off switch is very nice. It allows you to turn on and off the modem without plugging and unplugging the power cord repeatedly. It is definitely very handy when you need to reset the IP addressing – just turn off the modem for a minute, and then turn it back on. This is much more convenient.

In addition, Netgear CM700 comes with the DOCSIS QoS feature, which is supposedly smarter. It ensures optimum performance when serving multiple devices. You will not experience significant ups and downs in your connection speeds when there are other active Internet users in the network. It can also prioritize certain activities and devices.

Performance
The primary distinction between Netgear CM500 and Netgear CM700 is their maximum download and upload speeds. Netgear CM500 ‘only’ has 16×4 channel bonding, whereas Netgear CM700 is a beast with 32×8 channel bonding.

Netgear CM500 has 16×4 channel bonding, which means that this modem has 16 download channels and 4 upload channels. The channel bonding technology allows a modem to download data packets simultaneously through multiple channels. According to the specs, this model can reach a maximum download speed of 680 Mbps and a maximum upload speed of 132 Mbps.

For sure, Netgear CM500 is already sufficient if you only need Internet access for one computer or a few devices. However, if you really want the best performance for serving multiple devices, perhaps including entertainment activities such as movie streaming and gaming, you need a more powerful modem.

Netgear CM700, with 32×8 channel bonding, possesses 32 download channels and 8 upload channels. On paper, the maximum download speed is 1.4 Gbps. However, there will be a bottleneck effect, as the Gigabit Ethernet port only has a maximum bandwidth of 1.0 Gbps. Still, this modem is much faster, and is great for a broadband Internet service. You should choose this model if you need Internet access for more than two or three devices.

Compatibility
Both modems are compatible with most modern computers, including the ones running on Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms. Both modems are compatible with most popular Internet services, such as Xfinity from Comcast, Cox, Spectrum, and CableONE.

However, you need to pay attention to the maximum bandwidth of your Internet plan. Netgear CM500 is recommended for Internet plans of up to 200Mbps. Netgear CM700 is recommended for up to 500Mbps.

Also, note that both modems are not compatible with CenturyLink, AT&T, and Verizon. They are not suitable with bundled voice services.

Netgear CM500 Vs CM700

Netgear CM500Netgear CM700
BrandNetgearNetgear
Key features- NETGEAR CM500 cable modem - Compatible with Xfinity from Comcast, Spectrum, Cox, Cablevision & more - Cable Modem only (no WiFi router).Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.0, Firefox 2.0, Safari 1.4, or Google Chrome 11.0 browsers or higher- Support Cable Internet Service plans up to 500 Mbps. Separate router required for WiFi. 32x8 channel bonding . - DOCSIS 3.0 up to 32x faster download speeds than DOCSIS 2.0 - ELIMINTE MONTHLY CABLE MODEM RENTAL FEES - Up to $120 per year
Price

check here

Customer Rating3.7 out of 5.0 stars4.2 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Conclusion
In general, Netgear CM700 is more recommended. This modem has the best maximum download and upload speeds. It can deliver the best performance if you are using an Internet plan with a bandwidth above 200Mbps. It is more convenient to use because it has an on/off switch and the DOCSIS QoS feature.

Innova 3150F Vs 3160G

Having a diagnostic scan tool is very useful for maintaining your vehicle. It allows you to find out what’s wrong when you are encountering a problem with the vehicle. At least, it can help you avoid scams when taking the vehicle to the local mechanic. Below, we will discuss the differences between Innova 3150F vs 3160G diagnostic scan tools.

Continue reading below to find out more about:
– The display size and quality of each model
– The features and capabilities of these diagnostic scan tools
– Which model that can read live data
– The connectivity features of each model
– The included accessories of Innova 3150F vs 3160G
– Which model that is more recommended for the money

Display
You need to know that both Innova 3150 and Innova 3160 are available in some different variants with different displays. There are models that have the same capabilities, but with small black-and-white display which aren’t easy to read. Innova 3150F and Innova 3160G are models with the large color displays, and are much easier to use. See also: Actron CP9660 vs CP9670.

Still, Innova 3150F vs 3160G aren’t exactly similar in terms of dimensions. While they both have large color displays, Innova 3150F has a smaller display and a smaller overall size. On the other hand, Innova 3160G comes with a larger 3.5-inch LCD screen and a larger overall size.

Both models are still very portable. They are easy to handle. The curved casing is comfortable to grip, and the buttons are easy to reach. The display of Innova 3150F is not bad at all, but the display of Innova 3160G is definitely better because of the larger size. It is much easier to read without straining your eyes. It can show more information in one screen, hence minimizing scrolling.

Features and Capabilities
Most of the features and capabilities of Innova 3150F vs 3160G are similar. Both models are compatible with all domestic and foreign vehicles from 1996 or newer that use the OBD2 system. They cover cars, SUVs, light trucks, as well as hybrids.

The range of compatible brands and models is really impressive. In addition, both Innova 3150F and Innova 3160G are able to read various codes, including generic and some brand-specific ones. You can check the definitions of those codes on the official Innova website.

Both models are able to read and clear Check Engine Lights as well as ABS and SRS trouble codes. This is perhaps the most important feature for a diagnostic scan tool, as it allows you to determine what is wrong in your vehicle. Both models have the Freeze Frame capability to show engine-related conditions at the moment the Malfunction Indicator Lamp was activated. In addition, both models can reset Oil Light as well as Battery Maintenance Light & Initialization.

Both Innova 3150F and Innova 3160G are able to store the diagnostic data of more than one vehicle. Each of them is able to save the Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) of the last three scanned vehicles.

Both models are only designed to retrieve information, so they don’t have any risk of damaging your vehicle’s electronic system. Well, they do have the capabilities for initiating the O2 Test, the EVAP System Leak Test, and the Non-Continuous Test for vehicles that support these tests. But, then again, it is impossible for these devices to damage your vehicle’s electronic system, so they are completely safe to use.

Live Data
The biggest distinction between these two models is the Live Data capability. Innova 3150F does not have Live Data, so it can’t read your vehicle’s conditions in real time. It also can’t record the real time conditions for later analysis. This is quite a disadvantage.

Innova 3160G is often preferred by vehicle owners as well as mechanics because of the Live Data capability. This model can read your vehicle’s conditions in real time, so you can know for sure what is currently happening inside. It can stream and graph the real time data so that the information is easier to comprehend. In addition, this model is also able to record the live data for later analysis and evaluation, either on the unit’s display or on your computer.

Mobile App
Both Innova 3150F and Innova 3160G have built-in Bluetooth. With the built-in wireless connectivity, you can connect the diagnostic scan tool to your smartphone or tablet. You need to download the Repair Solutions mobile app to take advantage of this connectivity. Once connected to your smartphone or tablet, you can open the Repair Solutions mobile app to get a wide range of information regarding your vehicle’s diagnostics.

On the Repair Solutions mobile app, you can get the definition of the detected Diagnostic Trouble Code. It will explain to you the possible causes of the problem, along with the verified fixes. Furthermore, it can also provide step-by-step videos for the fixes. It even provides estimations for repair costs; you can compare the DIY cost and the repair shop cost.

This app is very useful for people who want to fix their vehicles by themselves. Even so, you still need to be careful. People with little to no knowledge and skill in vehicle mechanics should just ask a professional help to avoid further problems.

Don’t forget that both Innova 3150F and Innova 3160G can get free updates from the company’s official website. You should keep your diagnostic scan tool up to date to ensure that you have the latest information and technology.

What’s Included?
Each of these two models comes with the OBD2 cable for connecting to your vehicle and the USB cable to connect to your computer for transferring data and installing updates. The included OBD2 cable is very nice. The connector is equipped with LED lights for illumination. So, you can easily see the precise location of the port even when you are working in a dim garage.

Innova 3150F Vs 3160G

Innova 3150FInnova 3160G
BrandARRISARRIS
Key features- CHECK ENGINE LIGHT: Read and clear check engine lights (CEL) codes (DTC) on any 1996 & newer OBD2 (OBD II) car, truck, SUV or hybrid. Coverage includes vehicles such as Chevy, Ford, Chrysler, Honda, Lexus, Toyota, Mercedes Benz, BMW, Hyundai, Kia and any other makes sold in the US or Canada. Trilingual option allows descriptive definitions to appear in English, Spanish or French.- Read and clear check engine lights on any foreign or domestic 1996 and newer OBD2 car, light truck, SUV, and hybrids - Read and erase ABS & SRS trouble codes on most OBD2 domestic, Asian and European vehicles - Reset oil light on popular OBD2 vehicles - Reset battery maintenance light & Initialization
Price

Customer Rating4.2 out of 5.0 stars4.2 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Conclusion
Between these two models, Innova 3160G is much more recommended. The primary reason is the Live Data capability. It can stream and graph your vehicle’s conditions in real time. It can also record the real time data for later analysis. In addition, this model also has a larger display screen, so it is easier and more convenient to use.

Arris Surfboard SB6190 Vs SB6183

You are looking for the best modem that will allow you to take advantage of the maximum bandwidth that your Internet service provider can provide. Arris Surfboard SB6190 and Arris Surfboard SB6183 seem to be excellent options. Read the comparison between Arris Surfboard SB6190 vs SB6183 below to find out which model that gives the best value for the money!

What we will discuss below include:
– The design and dimensions of each model
– The connectivity options on each model
– The features and compatibilities of each model
– The performance of Arris Surfboard SB6190 vs SB6183
– The warranty information of each model
– Whether you should choose Arris Surfboard SB6190 or SB6183

Design
In terms of dimensions, Arris Surfboard SB6190 and Arris Surfboard SB6183 are actually similar. Each of them measures 5 inches (127 mm) high, 5 inches (127 mm) deep, and 2.1 inches (51 mm) wide. The weight difference is negligible. These modems are quite slim and compact, so they are easy to place. See also: Netgear CM500 vs CM400.

However, there is a notable difference in their designs. Arris Surfboard SB6190 comes with wall mount slots for two screws on one of the sides. So, if you don’t want to dedicate some space on your desk for the modem, you can just mount the modem on the wall.

On the other hand, Arris Surfboard SB6183 does not have wall mount slots. You need to use wall brackets if you really want to put it on the wall. Make sure that you don’t block the vent holes of the unit, otherwise overheating will be a serious problem.

Each of these two models is available in two color options, which are black and white. But, if you take a look at their rear panels, you can see that they are slightly different. Arris Surfboard SB6190’s ports are properly spaced so that the cables are less likely to disturb each other. Arris Surfboard SB6183’s port placement isn’t as good. The coaxial port and the power port are very close to each other.

Connectivity
Nevertheless, Arris Surfboard SB6190 vs SB6183 have similar connection ports. Both of them are ‘just’ cable modems. They don’t have any wireless capability or router functionality. So, if you want to use a modem to serve multiple devices, you need to pair the modem with a wireless access point or a router.

Each of these models has a 10/100/1000 Base-T Ethernet RJ-45 port and a 75-ohm F-type coaxial port. The Ethernet port supports a maximum speed of 1 Gbps. If you only use the modem on one computer, you can use a LAN cable to connect your computer to the modem directly.

However, if you want to provide Internet access for your home or small office network, you need to run a LAN cable from the Ethernet port to an Ethernet router (for a wired network) or a wireless access point (for a wireless network). Then, you can connect your devices to the router or wireless access point for Internet access.

Features
Both Arris Surfboard SB6190 vs SB6183 are compatible with the Arris SURFboard Manager and ARRIS Secure Internet by McAfee mobile apps. These mobile apps are available for iOS and Android devices. However, in order to connect your mobile device to the modem, you need a wireless access point, as the modem itself does not have any way to connect to mobile devices.

Once connected, the ARRIS SURFboard Manager mobile app can be extremely handy and convenient. This mobile app can provide a setup wizard for the initial setup process. In addition, the mobile app allows you to see the devices that are connected to the network. You can set Internet access rules and parental control for the network. You can also adjust the quality and availability of the network.

Through the ARRIS Secure Internet by McAfee mobile app, you can specify settings by user profile and get a notification in real-time whenever a new user is trying to access your network. This mobile app is really useful because it gives you full control over your network. People won’t be able to sneak into your network without your knowledge anymore.

Both models are compatible with most popular computer platforms. They can work with Macintosh OS 10 or higher as well as Windows XP or higher. However, although not specifically supported, older Windows versions should be able to work with these modems as well. Both models are compatible with UNIX and Linux computers, too.

Both models are compatible with most cable Internet services. They have been approved for Comcast Xfinity, Cox, and Spectrum (including Time Warner, Charter, and Brighthouse). However, note that these models are not compatible with CenturyLink, Verizon, and AT&T.

Performance
Of course, the biggest difference between Arris Surfboard SB6190 and Arris Surfboard SB6183 is the maximum download speeds. Although both models support DOCSIS 3.0, they come with different numbers of channels.

Arris Surfboard SB6190 has 32×8 channel bonding. It has 32 download channels and 8 upload channels. On paper, the maximum download speed is 1.4 Gbps. This is really awesome, indeed. But note that the actual maximum speed is still 1.0 Gbps due to the limitation of the Ethernet port. Still, Arris Surfboard SB6190 supports higher download speeds than its sibling here, so it should be your choice if you want to utilize the maximum bandwidth of your Internet service.

Arris Surfboard SB6183 is a cheaper model that has 16×4 channel bonding. With just 16 download channels and 4 upload channels, the overall performance won’t be as good as Arris Surfboard SB6190. The maximum download speed is only 686 Mbps. This model is not recommended if the bandwidth of the Internet service you are using is larger than that.

Warranty
Each of these two models is protected by a 2-year limited warranty. It covers defects in the materials and manufacturing. It doesn’t cover any damage that is caused by the user’s mistake. Even so, the warranty duration is good. The warranty is long enough to ensure that you do get a good, functional product. Note that the warranty is only available through the US-based customer service.

Arris Surfboard SB6190 Vs SB6183

Arris Surfboard SB6190Arris Surfboard SB6183
BrandARRISARRIS
Key features- Approved on Comcast Xfinity, Spectrum (Charter, Time Warner, Brighthouse Networks), Cox, Mediacom, Suddenlink and most other US Cable Internet Providers. NOT compatible with Verizon, AT&T or Centurylink. REQUIRES Internet Service - 32 Download and 8 Upload Bonded Channels capable of up to 1.4 Gbps download and 262 upload speeds. Recommended for Internet Plans 250 Mbps and above- APPROVED with Comcast Xfinity, Spectrum (Charter, Time Warner, Brighthouse), Cox and more. If not sure call your cable provider to find out if approved to use. REQUIRES Cable Internet Service - Not compatible with: Verizon, AT&T, or CenturyLink - Cable Modem only (no WiFi router). 16 download & 4 upload channels
Price

check here

Customer Rating4.0 out of 5.0 stars4.2 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Conclusion
Between these two models, Arris Surfboard SB6190 is more recommended. It is much better. It can be wall-mounted, and it has a higher channel bonding technology that allows higher download and upload speeds.

Actron CP9660 vs CP9670

In this article, we will discuss the differences and comparison between Actron CP9660 vs CP9670, two OBD2/CAN scanners that come from the same manufacturer. Actron is well-known in the automotive world for producing high-quality scanners that greatly help in diagnostics.So, which one is actually better for the money?

Continue reading below to learn more about:
– The similarities between these two models
– The vehicle compatibility of Actron CP9660 and CP9670
– The dimensions of each model
– The display quality of each model
– The distinctive capabilities of Actron CP9660 vs CP9670
– Which model that is generally more recommended

Similarities
In short, everything that Actron CP9660 can do, Actron CP9670 can do as well. These capabilities include all of the most essential functions. First of all, both models can connect to OBD2 and CAN systems. However, they are not compatible with OBD1 systems. They come with OBD2 cables, so you can use them right away. See also: Fluke 115 vs 117.

Both models are capable of reading live real-time engine data, including the sensor readings, coolant temperature, and RPM level. Furthermore, when they are connected to a vehicle, they can automatically read and show Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs), including the pending ones. This is very convenient. They are compatible with more than 4,000 DTC definitions that are commonly used in vehicles.

Both Actron CP9660 vs CP9670 can read and display the MIL status. They can also reset and the MIL and turn off the Check Engine indicator. They can read I/M monitors, Enhanced Engine and Transmission Codes, and vehicle VIN data. Finally, both models are capable of reading and displaying freeze frame data, alias the vehicle conditions when a fault happened. So, these devices are very useful for diagnostics and analyzing faulty/damaged vehicles.

Vehicle Compatibility
Both Actron CP9660 and Actron CP9670 are compatible with all domestic and import vehicles that run on OBD2 or CAN from 1996 and later. In addition, they are also compatible with OBD2-compliant vehicles from 1994 and 1995.

These units can read most ABS codes and definitions of Ford, GM, Chrysler, Honda, Nissan, Toyota, and Hyundai, especially on vehicles that are produced between 1996 and 2013. Their compatibility is really wide, so you probably won’t find any issue. They can read vehicle VIN data for models from 2000 or newer.

However, Actron CP9670 offers an even wider compatibility. While the cheaper model, Actron CP9660, only reads mostly generic codes, Actron CP9670 is also able to read manufacturer-specific DTC definitions. This is definitely very useful when dealing with certain vehicles and conditions. This also allows Actron CP9670 to provide live real-time data with more than 300 data PIDs. The data will be more complete, so you can perform more accurate diagnostics.

In addition, Actron CP9670 comes with the AutoID feature. Actron CP9660 doesn’t have this feature. With the AutoID feature, Actron CP9670 can automatically detect and identify most vehicles that are produced in 2000 or newer. This feature makes diagnostics and analysis quicker and easier.

Dimensions
Actron CP9660 is a bit smaller and lighter. It measures 9.30 inches x 6.30 inches x 1.40 inches. The weight is approximately 0.70 lbs. The build quality is good. The casing is apparently made from hard plastic, but it is sturdy and durable. The buttons are also solid and precise.

Actron CP9670 is a bit bigger and heavier. The display is notable larger. This unit measures 10.20 inches x 6.50 inches x 1.50 inches and weighs about 0.80 lbs. The casing is also hard plastic, but it looks better with a gloss finish. The top panel is colored black. The buttons are solid and precise too.

Display Quality
One significant difference between Actron CP9660 vs CP9670 is the display quality. Some people prefer Actron CP9670 over Actron CP9660 because of the display quality alone.

The display screen on Actron CP9660 is much smaller. It can only show a few lines of text. In addition, it is only a monochrome display screen, so everything is black and white. Due to the small size of the display, you will need to press the up and down buttons frequently to scroll. Reading the display can be a bit difficult when under direct sunlight.

The display of Actron CP9670 is much easier to read. It is much larger, so that it can show multiple lines. Furthermore, it is a color display. The colors make the operation more intuitive and more convenient. You can see more information without scrolling up and down repeatedly.

Features and Capabilities
You may consider Actron CP9660 to be quite basic, because Actron CP9670 comes with more advanced capabilities. As mentioned above, Actron CP9670 can AutoID vehicles and is compatible with manufacturer-specific DTCs. In addition, this unit can record, playback, and graph live data, so it is very useful for in-depth analysis.

Besides reading DTCs, Actron CP9670 can also erase them. The unit gives visual indicators when communicating and retrieving data from the vehicle, so you can know for precise whether the connection is working or not. It can read VIN, Cal ID, and CVN data of a vehicle.

Furthermore, Actron CP9670 comes with an acronym library and component locator. So, this model is suitable for beginners. The acronym library will help you understand technical terms. It can also provide full PID descriptions in the live data. The component locator provides a text-based description for the location of a component in the vehicle, and is definitely very helpful for both beginners and experienced users, as different vehicles may put things in different spots.

Finally, Actron CP9660 only supports English. This model does not support any other language by default. Actron CP9670 is already a trilingual device right out of the box. It supports English, Spanish, and French by default. So, Actron CP9670 is recommended for people who prefer to speak Spanish or French.

Actron CP9660 vs CP9670

Actron CP9660Actron CP9670
BrandActronActron
Key features- Reads ABS & OBD II generic codes for 1996 and newer vehicles - Live data vehicle sensor, switch and relay inputs in real time - Global OBD II Read/Erase codes commands with manufacturer specific definitions- Easy to read color LCD screen and Trilingual menu - Read & ErasABS codes and definitions for most 1996-2013 GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and Hyundai vehicles - Read & Erase DTCs
Price

Customer Rating4.5 out of 5.0 stars4.3 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Conclusion
Between these two models, Actron CP9670 is definitely more recommended. This model has a much better display screen. It also has more extensive features and capabilities, such as the ability to automatically identify vehicles and the ability to record and graph live data. It is also suitable for beginners, as it comes with an acronym library and component locator. It supports English, Spanish, and French right out of the box.

Netgear CM500 Vs CM400

In order to reduce your Internet cost, using your own modem instead of renting the one provided by your ISP is a good idea. Netgear CM500 and Netgear CM400 are often recommended for people who want to replace their modems. So, what is the difference between Netgear CM500 vs CM400? Which one is better?

Continue reading below to learn more about:
– The design and dimensions of each model
– The maximum download and upload speeds of each model
– The available connection options on each device
– The distinctive features of Netgear CM500 vs CM400
– The compatible services and platforms of each model
– Which modem that is generally more recommended

Design
Netgear CM500 and Netgear CM400 share some resemblances in their looks. Both are colored in black. Both have green light indicators. However, they are not completely identical. See also: Netgear CM600 Vs CM500.

Netgear CM500 is a bit larger and heavier. The dimensions are 7.28 inches x 4.88 inches x 2.36 inches, and the weight is about 0.62 lbs. Compared to its sibling here, this model is more rectangular with a stricter form. Also, it has an integrated stand. It can’t be mounted on the wall.

Netgear CM400 is smaller and lighter. It measures 5.8 inches x 3.8 inches x 1.8 inches and weighs 0.44 lbs. The overall form is rectangular, but the corners are far more rounded. It has a high-gloss finish on the side. It has a detachable stand, but it can’t be mounted on the wall.

Unfortunately, Netgear CM500 vs CM400 modems don’t have any power button. As the effect, when you want to turn off the modem for an extended time, you need to unplug the power cord. This is a bit inconvenient. On the good side, both modems have a reset button, so you don’t need to unplug in order to restart. The reset button is useful for troubleshooting problems in your Internet connection.

Connectivity
In terms of connectivity, these two models are identical. They each have one Ethernet port, one coaxial port, and one power port. You need a router in order to connect multiple devices to your modem.

Each model has one Gigabit Ethernet port with the auto-sensing technology. So, once you connect your computer to the modem using an Ethernet cable, the modem can automatically detect the computer and provide the Internet access.

Alternatively, in order to connect multiple computers, you can connect the modem to a router, and then connect the router to the PCs. However, Netgear CM500 is generally better than Netgear CM400 for serving multiple computers not only because of the larger bandwidth, but also because of its advanced QoS.

Features
One distinctive feature of Netgear CM500 is the advanced QoS (Quality of Service). The advanced QoS will allow the device to split the bandwidth evenly when serving multiple computers, and to prioritize the bandwidth for particular devices or activities. You can also limit guest access on the network.

Meanwhile, Netgear CM400 does not have an advanced QoS. So, it is not really recommended for serving multiple computers. It won’t be able to prioritize bandwidth for important devices or activities. So, for example, when you are playing an online game, you may experience some lag because someone else is downloading a video and consuming the bandwidth. The amount of control over the network is more limited.

Maximum Speed
One of the primary differences between Netgear CM500 vs CM400 is their maximum download speeds. Although they both already support the latest DOCSIS 3.0 technology, they come with different numbers of channels.

Netgear CM500 boasts 16×4 channel bonding, and is said to be 16x faster than DOCSIS 2.0. Channel bonding is a technology that uses multiple channels to increase throughput and reliability. Having 16×4 channel bonding means that Netgear CM500 can use 16 channels when downloading and 4 channels when uploading.

Unsurprisingly, Netgear CM500 can deliver much higher speeds. The download speed can reach up to 680 Mbps, while the upload speed can reach up to 132 Mbps. Of course, the actual speeds that you get also depend on your ISP and the servers whose services you are using. However, if you are using a high-speed Internet service, this modem will allow you to enjoy the optimum performance.

Netgear CM400 ‘only’ has 8×4 channel bonding. It is said to be 8x faster than DOCSIS 2.0. So, Netgear CM400 has 8 download channels and 4 upload channels. It has a maximum download speed of 343 Mbps and a maximum upload speed of 122 Mbps. This modem is good if your Internet service is of a low or medium tier. However, it may cause a bottleneck effect on a high-speed Internet service, as the available bandwidth is more limited.

Compatibility
Both models here are compatible with all popular Internet services, such as Comcast Xfinity, Cox, Cablevision, and Spectrum. However, note that these models are not compatible with cable-bundled voice services. Furthermore, they are compatible with different service tiers because of their different maximum speeds.

Netgear CM500 is suitable for Comcast Xfinity of up to 300 Mbps. It can work with the Ultimate service tier of Cox and is compatible with all service tiers of Spectrum. The maximum speed is 500 Mbps on Suddenlink and 200 Mbps on Optimum Cablevision. It works with the Internet 200 of Mediacom.

Netgear CM400 is suitable for Comcast Xfinity of up to 200 Mbps. It can work with the Premier 100 service tier of Cox. The maximum speed is only 100 Mbps on Spectrum, Suddenlink, and Optimum Cablevision. It also works with the Internet 200 of Mediacom.

Both models are compatible with most computers and operating systems that can run on a TCP/IP network. Both models are compatible with Windows and macOS computers. They work with Linux operating systems as well.

Netgear CM500 Vs CM400

Netgear CM500Netgear CM400
BrandNetgearNetgear
Key features- "The Best Cable Modem" - The WIRECUTTER - Support Cable Internet Service plans up to 200 Mbps. Separate router required for WiFi. 16x4 channel bonding. - DOCSIS 3.0 up to 16x faster download speeds than DOCSIS 2.0. Number of Ethernet Ports : One (1) Gigabit Ethernet port with auto-sensing technology- Support Cable Internet Service plans up to 100 Mbps. Separate router required for WiFi. - DOCSIS 3.0 Cable Modem with 1 Gigabit Ethernet port. DOCSIS 3.0 up to 8x faster download speeds than DOCSIS 2.0 - ELIMINTE MONTHLY CABLE MODEM RENTAL FEES - Up to $120 per year
Price

Customer Rating4.0 out of 5.0 stars4.0 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Conclusion
In general, Netgear CM500 is more recommended. This is a better modem with higher performance. Thanks to the 16×4 channel bonding, it can provide a maximum download speed of 680 Mbps. It also comes with an advanced QoS, so it can prioritize the bandwidth for important devices or activities.

Waste King vs InSinkErator


Waste King and InSinkErator are two major brands that people usually choose for a reliable garbage disposal. Both are known for their advanced features and exceptional quality, and both will help you keep your kitchen clean. In this article, we will see the comparison between Waste King vs InSinkErator to help you choose the right garbage disposal for your home.

What we will discuss in this article include:
– The design and build quality of each model
– The distinctive features of Waste King and InSinkErator
– Which model that is easier to use and maintain
– The noise comparison of Waste King vs InSinkErator
– The power and performance of each model
– The warranty that comes with each garbage disposal
– Which model that is more recommended for the money

Product Lines
First of all, let’s take a look at the product lines available in each brand. The different product lines are designed for different kinds of installation. So, it is important to know the differences of these product lines of Waste King vs InSinkErator. See also: Fluke 115 vs 117.

Waste King has two product lines, which are 3-Bolt Mount System and EZ Mount System. The 3-Bolt Mount System is the old line which still uses a traditional mount. It is somehow more difficult to install, but experienced plumbers may find it familiar. The EZ Mount System is features a new, modern mount that is generally easier to install.

InSinkErator also has two product lines. They are Badger and Evolution. The Badger series is the classic line that is familiar for most people. It has been around since the emergence of garbage disposal units, and it is still popular in these days. The Evolution series is the modern, renovated, and fully featured line. There is also a garbage disposal specially designed for a home that has a septic system.

Build Quality
The body of a Waste King garbage disposal is made from plastic. The mounting flange is also plastic. The build quality is generally good. It is certainly solid and durable. However, in general, plastic is not as durable as metal. So, while Waste King has good build quality, it probably isn’t as sturdy as InSinkErator.

The great thing about InSinkErator is that it is made from a better quality material. The mounting flange is made from metal. It is very tough and durable. In addition, it also has better aesthetics, as the metallic construction looks more elegant and stylish.

Size and Grinding Space
Waste King has many different models, but they all have a similar size. They are generally larger than InSinkErator. Because of that, Waste King is not really recommended if the space under your kitchen sink is very limited.

However, if you have enough space for the unit, you may want to consider this model because of the larger grinding space. Obviously, the larger size the unit means that it has more grinding space, and the extra grinding space will allow you to dispose more waste at once.

InSinkErator is especially great if you are looking for a compact garbage disposal. All InSinkErator models are more compact than Waste King’s. Some models are slightly smaller, with a height of about 13 inches. Some models are slightly above 13 inches. So, if the area under your kitchen sink is congested, an InSinkErator garbage disposal can be a perfect solution.

Features
One nice thing about Waste King is that it comes with a power cord. It has an integrated power cord, so the installation is easy and straightforward. You don’t need to purchase a separate power cord.

The strange thing about InSinkErator is that it does not come with a power cord. This is often complained by the buyers who didn’t know they had to buy a power cord separately. You need to spend a few more dollars to get a power cord. Actually, the additional cost isn’t really huge, and the installation is actually easy and simple. That’s just the need to purchase a power cord separately that is a little inconvenient.

One very important feature of a garbage disposal is the reset button. It is some sort of an emergency button when your unit gets stuck or jammed. Ideally, the reset button should be placed in a place that is easy to reach, such as the front of the unit. Waste King has it on the front, but InSinkErator has it on the bottom.

Noise
The next thing to consider when choosing between Waste King vs InSinkErator is the quietness of the operation. Excessive noise is incredibly annoying, especially at night.

The old Badger models from InSinkErator are really loud. The noise is seriously irritating. Meanwhile, Waste King garbage disposals do make some noise, but they are quite more tolerable.

If you want the quietest garbage disposal ever, consider InSinkErator’s Evolution models. They are much quieter. They only make light humming sound when working.

Power and Performance
In terms of power, Waste King and InSinkErator are similar. Both brands have powerful motors which can kitchen waste effortlessly. You should choose a garbage disposal based on how much waste that you frequently deal with. A more powerful unit can take care of more waste more quickly.

However, Waste King doesn’t have the multiple grinding stage technology. It only has a standard one-stage grinding mechanism. If the waste is not cut small enough, the debris may get stuck and block your drainage. In addition, some people have complained that Waste King’s splash guard prevents the water form draining quickly, but cutting the rubber sides a little bit can do the trick.

The latest models from InSinkErator come with the multiple grinding stage technology. It performs grinding multiple times to ensure that the waste is cut small enough to pass through the drainage. So, it is significantly less likely to get stuck. InSinkErator has a good splash guard design that allows water to pass quickly.

Warranty
In terms of warranty, Waste King is definitely better. It comes with a limited lifetime warranty. It brings a real peace of mind, as you know that your unit is protected from defects without time limitation.

InSinkErator’s warranty timeframes vary from model to model. There are some models that are warrantied for 4 years, and the longest warranty available is 7 years. While the warranty isn’t bad at all, it still doesn’t compare to Waste King’s lifetime warranty.

Waste King vs InSinkErator

- The 1 HP, 2800 RPM (115v) permanent magnet motor is sound-insulated and jams less
- Lifetime Limited In-Home Warranty.Current-Amps: 7.0. HZ: 60. Bearings - Permanently Lubricated : Sleeve Type
- Pre-installed power cord, no electrical work required
- Compact and lightweight garbage disposer with all stainless steel grind components
- SoundSeal Technology which delivers quieter performance versus a standard disposer
- MultiGrind Technology , with two-stage grind to quickly grind virtually any food waste
- 34.6 oz. Stainless steel grind chamber and grind components for longevity
- 3/4 Horsepower Dura-Drive® Induction Motor; power cord not included

Conclusion
Choosing between these two options is indeed difficult because they each have distinctive advantages. However, in the end, InSinkErator is more recommended. InSinkErator has a better build quality and is generally more compact. It has multiple grinding stages to ensure that the unit will never get stuck, and the modern models work very quietly.

Fluke 115 vs 117 True RMS Multimeter


Having a digital multimeter is vital for many modern professions. Technicians, engineers, and computer network specialists won’t be able to function properly without it. Digital multimeters are needed for various testing and troubleshooting cases. In this article, we will discuss the comparison between two popular digital multimeters, which are Fluke 115 vs 117. Which one is better for you?

Continue reading to learn more about:
– The similarities between Fluke 115 and Fluke 117
– The measurement ranges of each model
– The distinctive features of Fluke 115 vs 117
– Which model that is more convenient and practical to use
– Whether Fluke 115 or Fluke 117 is more recommended for you

The Similarities
Fluke 115 and Fluke 117 look very similar to each other. Each of them comes with a yellow housing and a black front panel. The dimensions are, in fact, identical. Each of them measures 6.57 x 3.31 x 1.82 inches (167 x 84x 3.31 x 1.82 inches (167 x 84 x 46 mm). Each of them weighs approximately 550 grams. Both are compact and lightweight units which you can easily bring along wherever you go. See also: Saitek X52 vs X52 Pro.

The manufacturer has optimized these models to be compact, portable, and ergonomic for easy one-handed operation. This is very convenient. When doing a field work, you often need to multi-task between your hands, so the simple one-handed operation is a big advantage.

Each of Fluke 115 vs 117 has a large selector knob on the front. This selector knob is easy and intuitive to use. Whether you are trying to measure voltage, current, capacitance, or resistance, you only need to move the selector to the right position. Both Fluke 115 and Fluke 117 come with backlit LED displays that allow you to work in low-light conditions. You can activate and deactivate the backlight by pressing a button.

Both Fluke 115 and Fluke 117 are also CAT III 600V certified. In other words, these models have been tested for the accuracy and safety when performing measurements in household environments. So, these are great options for home owners as well as professionals who work with installations with home voltage.

The measurement ranges and reading options are similar.Most of the features of these two models are similar. However, there are a few additional features that Fluke 115 doesn’t have but Fluke 117 has. Depending on your purpose, these additional features can be very useful.

Measurement Ranges
Both models here are True-RMS Multimeters that give accurate and reliable answers. Both models have 6000 count resolution, and are able to measure True RMS voltage and current, resistance, capacitance, and frequency. The measurement ranges and accuracy levels on Fluke 115 and Fluke 117 are identical.

Both models are able to measure DC and AC voltage of up to 6000 Volts. In addition, both models are also able to measure DC and AC current of up to 10 Amperes. Even so, you don’t need to worry in case of an overload, as they both can withstand overload of up to 20A for up to 30 seconds.

The resistance measurement range is from 600 Ohms to 6 Mega Ohms. The capacitance measurement range is from 1000 Nano Farad to 9999 Mikro Farad. The frequency measurement range is from 99.99 Hertz to 50 Kilo Hertz. With such wide measurement ranges, Fluke 115 and Fluke 117 are ideal for a wide range of field tests. They can provide accurate and quick verifications of measurements when needed.

Lo-Z Function
Both models can handle fluctuating signals very well. Each of them can show you the minimum, maximum, and average levels of the signal within the elapsed time. Both models are also compatible with the ToolPak magnetic hanger, which allows easy hands-free operation.

A difference between Fluke 115 vs 117 is that Fluke 115 does not have the Low Input Impedance (Lo-Z) function, whereas Fluke 117 has. The Lo-Z function is very useful for preventing a false reading that may be caused by ghost voltage. As the effect, Fluke 117 is generally more reliable and more accurate than Fluke 115.

In case that you are wondering, ghost voltage is that voltage that still exists even after the circuit is disconnected from the electrical source and has absolutely zero current. There are some possible factors that contribute to this issue, and one of them is the input impedance of the digital multimeter. Large input impedance may lead to a faulty reading. However, Fluke 117 has an option to let you switch to a low input impedance mode for an accurate reading.

AutoVolt and VoltAlert
Next, Fluke 115 does not have the AutoVolt feature. You have to select the correct measurement manually. This is very time consuming when you don’t know the voltage range of the circuit, as you will need to test from the highest possible level. Not to mention the risk that making a wrong voltage selection may damage the unit. With Fluke 115, you have to do the measurement the traditional way with probes.

On the other hand, Fluke 117 comes with the AutoVolt feature. With this feature, Fluke 117 can automatically detect and select the right DC or AC voltage measurement. This is incredibly useful and convenient. When you have no idea about the voltage range of the circuit, you just need to select the AutoVolt position on the selector knob.

In addition, Fluke 117 comes with the VoltAlert technology. This is a very cool feature. With this feature, you can perform non-contact voltage detection. You only need to bring the unit close to the circuit to detect the voltage, without using probes. This is very practical. It can save you quite some time when working.

Battery Life and Warranty
These digital multimeters use the same type of battery. Each of them runs on a 9V alkaline battery. The battery life is excellent. Each model can last for about 400 hours per battery if the backlight is not activated. However, if you often use the backlight, the battery life will certainly become shorter.

Each model here is protected by a 3-year warranty. This is very good. The warranty timeframe is quite long, and it is a proof that the company is confident of the quality and durability.

Fluke 115 vs 117

- Bundle includes Fluke 115 Compact True-RMS Digital Multimeter and Fluke C35 Polyester Soft Carrying Case
- Check continuity, frequency, capacitance and diode test
- Measures 20 A (30 seconds momentary; 10 A continuous)
- CAT III 600 V safety rated
- Case opens laterally to allow use of test tools without removing them
- AutoVolt automatic AC/DC voltage selection. DC millivolts - Range : 600.0 mV, Resolution : 0.1 mV
- VoltAlert™ technology for non-contact voltage detection
- Low input impedance: helps prevent false readings due to ghost voltage
- Large white LED backlight to work in poorly lit areas
- True RMS for accurate measurements on non-linear loads

Conclusion
Between these two models, Fluke 117 is certainly more recommended. It comes with better features. It has the Lo-Z function to prevent ghost voltage for more accurate and reliable reading. It also has the AutoVolt feature to select DC or AC voltage range automatically, and the VoltAlert feature for non-contact voltage detection.

Saitek X52 Vs X52 Pro Flight Control System


It is not an overstatement to say that flight simulator fans are among the most demanding gamers. We need a controller system that is absolutely precise and solid to enjoy a realistic flight simulation. In this article, we will discuss the comparison between Saitek X52 vs X52 Pro to help you choose the best controller system for your favorite games.

Below, we will discuss further about:
– The design and appearance of each model
– The comparison of the build quality and durability
– The special features of Saitek X52 and Saitek X52 Pro
– The performance comparison of Saitek X52 vs X52 Pro
– Which flight controller system that is more recommended

Design
You can easily distinguish these two models from each other by their color. They come with different colors. The regular Saitek X52 is dominated by gray and silver colors. It has blue indicator lights. It does look very nice. On the other hand, Saitek X52 Pro is dominated by a dark black color. The “Safe” button is red. This model looks classy and professional.

You can’t really tell what materials that a product features only from the look alone. However, you can tell if it feels nice once you put your hands on it. This is the case with the regular Saitek X52, which uses many plastic parts. Due to using many plastic parts, the controller feels cheap and toyish. See also: Logitech G430 vs G230.

On the other hand, Saitek X52 Pro feels much better. It feels truly like a high-quality controller, thanks to the sturdy build and metallic parts. If you hate controllers that feel cheap and toyish, then you should choose this particular model.

The dimensions of Saitek X52vs X52 Pro are mostly similar, except for the weight. They are identical in terms of width, depth, and height. The ergonomics are also similar. Both models have excellent ergonomics that make them very comfortable to use. The difference is that the regular Saitek X52 is lighter, due to the plastic parts. Saitek X52 Pro is noticeably heavier because of the metallic parts.

Build Quality
As mentioned above, one big difference between Saitek X52 and Saitek X52 Pro is the materials. Saitek X52 uses many plastic parts, whereas Saitek X52 Pro uses metallic parts. The durability and longevity are obviously affected.

The regular Saitek X52 is significantly less durable. The plastic parts are easy to break. They will not last for very long. Some gamers tend to throw their controllers when raged; Saitek X52 will not survive frequent beatings like that.

This model requires you to put great care and attention to the controller. You should not abuse it if you don’t want to spend your money for nothing. Even without frequent abuse, the plastic parts may get worn pretty quickly.

Saitek X52 Pro is much more durable. Well, still, it is not recommended to abuse your controller, if you want to get the most out of it. But Saitek X52 Pro is able to withstand some beating every now and then, so it is a better choice for gamers who have the tendency to rage. In addition, the metallic parts do not wear quickly. As the effect, the controller can last for quite a long time before needing a replacement.

Features
In terms of features, Saitek X52 and Saitek X52 Pro are identical. They have similar features and functions. This is why some people prefer to stick with the regular version instead of upgrading to the pro version.

Each of the two models comes with an intuitive Multi-Function Display (MFD) that can show different commands for different games. This feature is very useful and powerful, as you can put 105 programmable commands in it. You can coordinate your flight plans with the clock and stopwatch functions. There are 2 dedicated buttons and 2 rotary dials for controlling additional game functions.

Each of them also has an adjustable handle, which can accommodate a variety of hand sizes. There are 5 selectable positions available. The soft-touch surface with a contoured grip provides an incredibly comfortable and solid feel.

Each of the two models also comes with a progressive throttle. The resistance is adjustable, so you can customize it to get the perfect, most realistic feel. In addition, each model also has a precision centering mechanism with the No-Contact Technology between the X and Y axes for constant and accurate control.

Programmability
Both Saitek X52 and Saitek X52 Pro are programmable. You can connect either model to your computer via USB,but don’t forget that you need at least 2 USB ports. Both models here are compatible with Windows 7, Windows 8.1, and Windows 10.

In order to program the unit, you need to download the Saitek Smart Technology app and install it on your computer. This software allows you to link your keyboard keys and mouse buttons with the buttons and axes of your Saitek controller system. You can create different profiles for different games, and the different profiles will carry different commands.

Performance
There is a big difference in the performance of Saitek X52 vs X52 Pro. This is spoken out loud especially by the experienced and serious players. Saitek X52, with the plastic parts, has a significantly lower tensioning. As the effect, the controller is loose and often inaccurate. The looseness and inaccuracy are both very annoying, at least for the more serious players.

That said, there are some people who don’t mind the low tensioning of the regular Saitek X52. This is indeed the smaller group of people, as the majority greatly prefers the pro version. This is just to say that the regular Saitek X52 is still pretty usable.

On the other hand, Saitek X52 Pro is very much stiffer. It has a higher tensioning. As the effect, it feels much more precise and accurate. If you want a controller with the best, most reliable performance, Saitek X52 Pro should be your choice.

Saitek X52 Vs X52 Pro

- Illuminated buttons and enhanced gameplay through intuitive LCD Multi-Function Display
- Progressive throttle with resistance adjustment and detents for afterburner and idle
- Precision centering mechanism; no contact technology on X and Y axes and constant spring force improve control
- Program your controller for each game using the powerful Smart Technology software
- 5 position handle adjustment system to suit all hand sizes with soft-touch, contoured grip for maximum gaming comfort
- Advanced Multi-Function Display (MFD) for real flying interaction
- 2 dedicated MFD buttons and 2 rotary dials with in-built buttons to control additional game functionality
- Joystick with precision centering mechanism, non-contact technology on X and Y axes and constant spring force
- Progressive throttle with tension adjustment, detents for afterburner and idle; 2 fire buttons
- Works with: Windows XP, XP64 and Vista (all versions) and Windows 7

Conclusion
Although these two models come with similar ergonomics and features, Saitek X52 Pro is much more recommended in the end. This is because of the much better build quality and tensioning. It has metallic parts that are much more durable. The controller is stiffer with a higher tensioning, so it feels more accurate.

Motorola SB6121 Vs SB6120


In this article, we will discuss the comparison between Motorola SB6121 Vs SB6120 to determine which one is better for the money. Both of these two models are cable modems that come from Motorola’s SURF board series. Both of them already have DOCSIS 3.0. However, one of them is older, while the other is newer.

Continue reading to learn more about:
– The design and dimensions of each cable modem
– The available connection options on each cable modem
– The importance of DOCSIS 3.0 in your cable modem
– The hardware of Motorola SB6121 Vs SB6120
– The performance comparison of the two Motorola models
– Which Motorola cable modem that is more recommended

Design
This is the easiest difference between Motorola SB6120 and Motorola SB6121 to spot. They have very different looks. Most people will agree that Motorola SB6121 is the one with a better, more attractive appearance. Not to mention that it is also slimmer and more compact. See also: Netgear CM600 vs CM500.

Motorola SB6120 comes with a boxy shape.The whole housing is plain black, except for the light indicators and their labels on the left side of the unit. Motorola SB6120 looks really plain and unattractive. According to the data sheet, this cable modem measures 5.7 inches x 5.7 inches x 1.5 inches.

On the other hand, Motorola SB6121 is still shaped like a box, but the edges and corners are all rounded. The sides have numerous vent holes. On the front panel, there are several light indicators, along with the brand logo, the product name, and the power button. The lights have different icon shapes, and they have different colors, so you can quickly understand the unit’s status and condition.

Compared to Motorola SB6120, Motorola SB6121 is slightly smaller. According to CNET, it measures 5.2 inches x 5.2 inches x 1.7 inches. As the effect, it should be easy to fit into your room. The addition of a power button is very nice. Turning on and off the modem becomes easier and more convenient.

Connectivity and Setup
In terms of connectivity, Motorola SB6121 Vs SB6120 are identical. These are simple cable modems designed for high-speed residential and commercial uses. You can find the connection ports of a unit on the rear panel.

There are just three ports here. The uppermost port is the 10/100/1000 Base-T Gigabit Ethernet port. This is where you plug the LAN cable to connect it to your computer. With the Gigabit Ethernet port, Motorola SB6120 and Motorola SB6121 are ready to give you incredibly fast and blazing wired network speeds.

Then, there is a standard cable interface. It is a 75-ohm F-connector. This is where you plug the coaxial cable which connects the cable modem to the Internet Service Provider (ISP). Finally, there is the power interface to connect the unit to a power outlet; the unit accepts voltages between 105 and 125 V AC in North America.

Once you have connected all of the necessary cables correctly, you are ready to go. Simply switch on your computer and the cable modem. Depending on the ISP, you may need to login and do some setup before you can start surfing the Internet.

Why You Need DOCSIS 3.0
The major selling point of both Motorola SB6120 and Motorola SB6121 is DOCSIS 3.0. Many Internet service providers have mentioned that using a cable modem that supports DOCSIS 3.0 is very important. So, what is it, exactly? Why is it necessary in the first place?

First of all, DOCSIS is the short for Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification. It is the international standard for high-bandwidth data transfer to cable TVs. It is now used by various cable television operators in order to provide Internet access over their already existing hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) network.

The latest version is DOCSIS 3.0. It was released in August 2006. This version is very important because it gives cable Internet providers the ability to provide ultra-fast broadband connections to their users. Of course, if you want to enjoy the best connection speeds, your cable modem needs to support the technology. DOCSIS 3.0 uses channel bonding to allow such impressive performance.

In channel bonding, upstream and downstream data payloads are transferred through multiple individual QAM channels. By bonding multiple channels together, it can increase the available bandwidth. This method effectively raises the data transfer speed.

Hardware
The next difference between Motorola SB6121 Vs SB6120 is that Motorola SB6120 is an older model. Many people believe that this model still uses older hardware. Hence, it is a possibility that Motorola SB6120 will not be as durable as Motorola SB6121.

Motorola SB6121 is a newer model. It is equipped with newer hardware, even though the firmware is actually the same. Because it comes with newer hardware, the durability and longevity are more likely to last. It will be better supported in the future, too.

Performance
Both Motorola SB6120 and Motorola SB6121 are 4×4 cable modems. It means that each of them has 4 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels. The theoretical maximum bandwidths are 152 Mbps for downstream and 108 Mbps for upstream.

In real use, you will not find a real difference in the performance of Motorola SB6120 and Motorola SB6121. They have similar features and performance. The specifications are identical.

They perform very well, and they can give you very good DOCSIS 3.0 performance. Both Motorola SB6120 and Motorola SB6121 can give very high Internet access speeds. You can download huge files in an instant, and you can get incredibly smooth and lag-free gaming experience.

But, then again, the Internet speeds also depend on the ISP as well as your computer. It is quite unlikely that Motorola SB6120 or Motorola SB6121 will cause a bottleneck effect to your Internet access. But if the ISP or your computer is having some problem, you may not be able to enjoy the maximum performance.

Motorola SB6121 Vs SB6120

- DOCSIS 3.0 certified, capable of up to 172 Mbps and upload speeds up to 131 Mbps based on - Cable Internet Service Provider
Supports IPv4 and IPv6 networking, as well as Windows, Mac, and Linux computers
- 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet port to connect with router or computer
- Requires Cable Internet Service. Compatible with major U.S. Cable Providers
- Designed to provide a cost effective, next generation technology to offer a high speed residential or commercial service tier. Item is Cable MODEM ONLY
- User-friendly online diagnostics and bonded channel status page
- Features a 10/100/1000Base-T Gigabit Port for incredible wired network speeds
- Capable of downloading up to 2000 times faster than 56k analog phone modems

Conclusion
Between these two models, we recommend you to choose Motorola SB6121. This model is newer. It has a better, more attractive design. It also has a power button for easy control. As a newer model, it certainly comes with newer hardware, so the durability and longevity should be better.