KDLINKS X1 and KDLINKS DX2 are both popular dash cam products that come from the same company. So, why are these models so popular? What is the difference between KDLINKS X1 vs DX2? This article will help you answer those questions so that you can determine which dash cam is worth your money.

Continue reading below to learn more about:
– The distinctive features of each dashboard camera,
– The performance and video quality of KDLINKS X1 vs DX2,
– The weaknesses of each model, and
– Which dash cam that is generally more recommended.

KDLINKS X1 has become one of the best-selling dash cams in the market, for good reasons. It is quite affordable, yet it comes with a full gamut of features. It has a clear 2.7-inch display, a separate GPS module which can be plugged into the camera, 160-degree Full HD video, and an included 8GB SD card.

The field of view is not the widest among dash cams – KDLINKS DX2 is the one that has the privilege – but it is already wide enough to capture everything that may happen on the street in front of you. The video quality is very good, with excellent details and colors. There is some fish-eye effect due to the wide field of view, but you can employ a de-fishing filter in your video software whenever the footage is needed.

The dash cam is thin, small, and lightweight. The locking suction mount is very easy to adjust. There are actually two mounts available, one has the GPS module and the other one without. KDLINKS X1 has a micro-USB port for power and for offloading videos to your PC, so you don’t need a memory card reader.

The only issue with KDLINKS X1 is that you need to set the date and time manually. There is no timestamp feature. This is very inconvenient, especially when in a legal situation.

KDLINKS DX2 is a newer model compared to KDLINKS X1. Unlike its predecessor, KDLINKS DX2 is a dual-camera dash cam system with one camera aimed to the front (1080p resolution, 165 degrees field of view) and the other one to the rear (720p resolution, 125 degrees field of view). This is why the camera claims to have a total field of view of 290 degrees. By the way, you can read the detailed specifications from KDLINKS here!

KDLINKS DX2 is equipped with a six-glass Nikon lens, which has a maximum aperture of F/1.6. This is a very capable lens that can easily gather enough light in low-light situations. In addition, KDLINKS DX2 also employs the Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) technology, which makes the camera pick the widest spectrum of luminosity all the time. Whether it is day or night, in an open road or in a tunnel, the camera always gives you good quality and visible footage.

Furthermore, KDLINKS DX2 supports loop recording, gravity sensing, and memory lock. Just like most other dash cams, KDLINKS DX2 records to the memory card in a loop, meaning that after the storage is full the camera will erase the oldest video for the new recordings. However, when an accident happens, the associated video is locked so that it won’t be erased.


Key features- Full-HD Video 1920*1080 at 30 fps, super wide 165° angle. The X1 dash cam can automatically record hands-free in a continuous loop. Large 2.7" screen, super slim design. Come with 8GB micro SD card, ready to use right out of the box. - Superior Night-vision by world class F1.6 Six-Glass lenses, and unique dashcam WDR (Wide Dynamic Range) video system (Similar to HDR technology in Camera)- Front + Rear 2 Lens System + CPL Filter. HD Video 1080P at 30 fps, super wide 165° + 125° angle. The DX2 dash cam can automatically record hands-free in a continuous loop. Large 3" screen, super slim design. Come with 16GB micro SD card, ready to use right out of the box. - Superior Night-vision by world class F1.6 Six-Glass lenses, and unique dashcam WDR (Wide Dynamic Range) video system (Similar to HDR technology in Camera)

Customer Rating4.3 out of 5.0 stars4.1 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Between these two dash cams, we highly recommend you to choose KDLINKS DX2. This model is newer and much more advanced. It actually has two cameras for the front and rear, ensuring complete coverage. The recording quality is even better, thanks to the advanced lens. It also comes with gravity sensing and memory lock.

Syma X5c Vs X5SW

The Syma X5SW is an updated version of the Syma X5C, the best-selling drone of Amazon for its great value for money, high performance and video quality. The Syma X5SW is presented with some improvements regarding its predecessor and also with a version, the Syma X5SW, with the same features as the X5C. That are the fact about them that making people have to compare to look after the difference. Lets make it into Syma X5C vs X5SW.

Syma X5C
Syma X5C Explorers Quad Copter is one of the Best-Seller Quadcopter. This model is super Affordable, lightweight, user-friendly and offers a Great Experience Flight. Features 6 Axis Gyroscope, HD Camera, Less power consumption, the level of Control Technology, Piloting Various Spectrum and so on. This is ideal for beginners Quadcopter RC or Novice, because it allows to perform various stunts and reversing the movement action. Drones are already equipped camera for taking photos and video of the 2 megapixel resolution. There is also a 6-axis system feature that allows the quadcoper launched by hand by way of thrown or flying, while the 6-axis gyro to make a stable, controlled flight with ease, and is able to appropriate level against the wind. Drone is powered by 2.4 technology adopted for anti-interference. This means that can fly with other quadcopter without harming the frequency of each other. It can be flew either in the Indoor and Outdoor, propeller has a seat on the flying in Indoor, outdoor safety if the propeller should removed so quadcopter can fly more agile. Not only that, it can also fly over the top, bottom, right and left, forward, backward, turn with gyro/flash lamp, A 360 degree 3D and special functions that will roll continuously.

Syma X5SW
Syma X5SW is the latest and most advanced model for the kind of toys X 5 grade quadcopter from Syma. He also was the most expensive model of its kind, although the differences are small, and are the only models who have featured video FPV (First Person View/first person View) via WiFi network and is available in black, red, or White. Syma X5SW capable of transmitting video FPV via WiFi network. To see the video of her, ye FPV must first install app Syma FPV on your smartphone App Syma FPV available for Android and Apple’s iOS as well. Syma X5SW 500mAh battery which only has the power 6-7 minute flight time and takes 90 minutes to charge via USB. Syma X5SW made of entirely plastic, although it declined to an average fall or impact on hard-hit an object, will make the blades bend and landing gear brakes. Luckily X5SW package comes with additional material. This quadcopter enough for indoor and outdoor flying and can do some tricks action 3D (roll-over in the air) by simply pressing a button. If you choose to select the phone as the hardware of your package X5SW, FPV is equipped with a phone holder, making it easy for pilots to put the phone right on top of the transmitter.

Syma X5c Vs X5SW

Syma X5cSyma X5SW
Key features- Equipped with HD camera - Perform flips at the press of a button with 360 degree eversion, Wind resistant and can be flown indoors or outdoors - 6-axis Gyro stabilization system ensures maximum stability during flight - 7 Minute flight time and 100 minute charge time- Equipped with the latest 6-axis flight control systems, 3D lock, More scheduled flight, operating more to the force! - Equipped with HD camera to take photos and videos while flying! Bring a new perspective to your photos and videos from the air

Customer Rating4.0 out of 5.0 stars3.7 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

If you want to buy the Syma X5SW, actually it’s the same as the Syma X5C only that the camera comes equipped with WiFi so you can connect the drone camera to your mobile phone and see in real time what the drone sees. Overall, you can do it in the following links. You have the links for the drone with 2 MP camera and 0.3 MP. This is Syma X5c vs X5SW.

Blink XT Vs Arlo Pro

Today, home security is a serious concern. Homeowners have started to invest in various gadgets and advanced systems in order to increase their security levels. A simple, easy way to greatly improve the safety of your home is installing a security camera. It is relatively affordable and easy to install, and it can already give you the ability to monitor the condition of your home from time to time. Right now, two of the most popular wireless security cameras are Blink XT vs Arlo Pro.

Both Blink and Arlo are well-known, trustworthy manufacturers that have produces some of the best security products. Hence, choosing between Blink XT and Arlo Pro can be difficult. But there are several key differences that set these two models apart. Which one has the best features and performance? Which one has the best value for the money? Find out below.

One of the factors that one needs to consider when choosing between Blink XT vs Arlo Pro is the design. If you wish to hide and conceal your security camera, you need something that can blend with the environment – preferably, it has the same color as its surrounding – and it should be slim and compact not to attract attention.

Although Blink XT’s body is quite wide, it is actually quite slim. When mounted on a vertical surface, such as the wall, it does not protrude so much, making it easy to conceal. The overall dimensions are 3.23 inches x 8.96 inches x 9.06 inches, so it literally fits anywhere. One can say that it is a beautifully designed security camera. The black color also makes this security camera easy to hide.

On the other hand, Arlo Pro is actually even smaller and more compact. The overall dimensions are only 2.8 inches x 1.9 inches x 3.1 inches. With such size, it is very easy to place, both indoor and outdoor. However, it is not easy to conceal. The body has two colors; the front face is black whereas the rest of the body is white. In addition, the mounting system is quite bulky. Well, apparently, this security camera is not designed to be hidden. At least, it looks stylish and modern, so you can show it off to your guests.

You can say that both of these two products are DIY security cameras. You don’t really need any expert service; you can install them completely by yourself. They are easy and quick to install.

Setting up the Blink XT security camera only takes a few minutes to complete. There are three simple steps to be done. First of all, you need to download the Blink Mobile app on your smartphone or tablet. Create a new account with a valid email address. Second, you need to set up the Sync module. This part can be confusing sometimes, but the user’s manual is actually very helpful. Third, you can now see the “Add a Blink Camera” button in the app, and simply press on it. Enter the serial number of your Blink XT camera, and follow the steps, and everything is done.

Arlo Pro is relatively easier and more intuitive to install. It also takes just a few minutes. First, you need to connect the base to the Internet and power outlet. Second, install the Arlo mobile app in your smartphone or tablet. Third, place the batteries inside the Arlo Pro camera. Fourth, click on the “New System Setup” button in the mobile app, and select theArlo Base Station. The mobile app will automatically detect the base station in your wireless network, and just follow the steps. Fifth, you need to sync your Arlo Pro with the base station. Afterward, you can place the camera where needed.

Both Blink XT and Arlo Pro cameras are 100% wireless, making them very easy and versatile to place. Both products also provide free cloud storage. They can upload their recordings to the cloud for easy access. However, Blink XT does not have any local storage; Arlo Pro has local storage so that you can have two copies of each recording, one in the local storage and the other one in the cloud.

Blink XTvsArlo Pro come with different features. So, consider carefully what features that you need the most. Blink XT is great because the mobile app is neat and efficient. You can easily adjust various camera settings through the mobile app, such as clip recording length, retrigger time, sensitivity level, and audio settings.

Blink XT can record in 720p and 1080p. However, in order to save storage space and bandwidth, using the 720p setting is more recommended. It has a built-in infrared light for night vision and low-light illumination. The night vision enables the camera to see up to 20 feet away.

Arlo Pro’s mobile app is somehow not as intuitive, but it is also powerful. You can adjust various settings including the camera sensitivity. You definitely want to adjust the camera sensitivity first to stop false alerts. Unfortunately, the mobile app can be quite slow and laggy; there can be a three-second lag when you open the notification pop-up.

The distinctive feature is that Arlo Pro has the Live View mode, allowing you to stream what your camera sees in real-time. Arlo Pro also supports two-way audio, which means that you can both hear what is happening and speak through the camera’s built-in speaker.

Arlo Pro only records in 720p, but this is not a problem at all, especially considering the excellent image quality. Arlo Pro has a night mode, in which it records in black-and-white.

Video Quality
Finally, the factor that people usually compare between Blink XTvsArlo Pro is the video quality. In general, Blink XT’s video quality is good. You can use the 1080p video setting if you really want increased sharpness and detail. However, the field of view is pretty narrow at just 110 degrees.

Even though Arlo Pro only records in 720p, the image quality is excellent. It captures images with fine detail and sharpness. The black-and-white night mode is also surprisingly very sharp. You can see almost everything clearly. And, the field of view is wider at 130 degrees.

Blink XTArlo Pro
BrandBlink Home SecurityNETGEAR
Key features- ADD-On Blink XT Camera for existing Blink Customer Systems (Does not include required Blink Sync Module - only works with an existing system) - MOTION DETECTOR: Built-in motion sensor alarm, when motion detector is triggered, WIFI cameras will send an alert to your smartphone and record a short clip of the event to the cloud- Works with Amazon Alexa/Echo Show/(Fire TV coming soon!) - View your live video with a simple voice command - Add on Camera only - Base Station Required - 100% Wire-free - Free of power cords and wiring hassles, allowing you to easily place Arlo Pro cameras wherever you want and monitor your home from every angle

Customer Rating4.0 out of 5.0 stars4.3 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

In general, Arlo Pro is the best way to go. It has great video quality, with better field of view. The Live View and two-way audio can be very useful in various situations. However, you can choose Blink XT if you really need something that is easy to conceal, or if you prefer a fast mobile app over the real-time view.

GoPro Hero 5 Vs Hero 4 Silver

GoPro is the company that developed the action camera trend. Unsurprisingly, when looking for a decent action camera, the GoPro line is the first one that people look. Being the most popular one does not GoPro from improving and innovating. Recently, the company has released their latest action camera model, GoPro Hero 5. It is sold in a similar price range as the previous GoPro Hero 4 Silver. So, you are now probably wondering whether GoPro Hero 5 is better than GoPro Hero 4 Silver or not. Well, see the comparisons between GoPro Hero 5 vs Hero 4 Silver below!

Design and Dimension
Put GoPro Hero 5 next to GoPro Hero 4 Silver, and you can immediately tell that it is just very slightly larger. The black action camera (well, the color is actually more of dark gray rather than black) measures 44.6 mm x 62 mm x 32.7 mm. On the other hand, the white-colored model measures only 41 mm x 59 mm x 30 mm.

You see, the differences are just a matter of several millimeters. But, then again, if you want to put your action camera in your shirt pocket, the smaller one is indeed more convenient.

GoPro Hero 5 is also heavier than GoPro Hero 4 Silver. The new release has a weight of 117 grams, whereas the old model is barely 83 grams. Again, the added heaviness is not all that dramatic, but still noticeable if you want to pocket the camera.

The special thing about GoPro Hero 5 is that the body is already waterproof out of the box. It does not need any additional housing to be used in water! This is very cool. It is waterproof to 33 feet (10 m) under water, and that is pretty much the same as the waterproofing rating of additional housing. You will be able to use the camera in the rain and under water without worrying about some drops leaking in.

On the other hand, GoPro Hero 4 Silver requires an additional housing in order to withstand water. The additional housing can make the camera so much beefier and heavier.

Touch Screen Display
One of the most apparent differences between GoPro Hero 5 vs Hero 4 Silver is the display screen. Each of the two models is equipped with a two-inch display screen that also functions as touch screen control. Through the display screen, you can get a live view of what the camera is seeing, play back a recorded video, and interact with several settings.

However, GoPro Hero 5’s display screen has been greatly improved. Compared to GoPro Hero 4 Silver’s display screen, it has much better brightness, contrast, and sharpness. It also has better touch sensitivity so that you won’t have to press all the way down in frustration.

Video Recording Performance
Apparently, GoPro Hero 5 still uses the same image sensor as GoPro Hero 4 Silver. You can say so, because the maximum image resolution is still the same. Both models can record videos in the maximum resolution of 4K, and capture still images in 12 MP. If you put two shots from GoPro Hero 5 and GoPro Hero 4 Silver side by side, you can see that they have similar brightness and contrast.

However, GoPro Hero 5 is not without any improvement. GoPro Hero 5 comes with slightly improved processing algorithms that enable higher frame rates. It is already able to record 4K videos at 30 fps, 2.7K videos at 60 fps, and 1080p videos at 120 fps. On the other hand, GoPro Hero 4 Silver can only record 4K at 15 fps, 2.7K at 30 fps, and 1080p videos at 60 fps. So, if you want to be able to record fast actions and sports with decent sharpness and clarity without so much motion blur in 4K, you should choose GoPro Hero 5.

In addition, GoPro Hero 5 also comes with a new feature called video stabilization. The built-in video stabilization has been one of the most highlighted features of GoPro Hero 5. It is basically similar to the stabilization feature of video editing software, designed to smooth out the jerkiness of unstabilized footage.

The video stabilization works great. It can greatly smooth out the vibrations when the camera is mounted on a bike, giving you a much more visually pleasant video. Well, you should stay realistic; it won’t be any better than the standalone GoPro Karma gimbal, which is probably what you should use in extreme cases. However, the improvement it offers is still quite a dramatic one, and it will be very useful in various situations.

Additional Features
GoPro Hero 5 comes with some additional features that GoPro Hero 4 Silver doesn’t have. First, it comes with the dual mic system, which enables the camera to capture more surround-like audio. Second, perhaps this is the coolest feature, it now supports voice control for hands-free operation. Telling the camera to snap a photograph is as simple as saying “GoPro, take a photo!”

Both GoPro Hero 5 vs Hero 4 Silver are equipped with built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. Both have Protune for tuning and enhancing your photos and videos. However, GoPro Hero 5 also adds GPS location tags to the metadata of photos and videos, making it possible to sort the files by location. Furthermore, GoPro Hero 5 has a built-in function for automatic uploading to the GoPro Plus cloud storage.

Battery Life
Finally, the last comparison between GoPro Hero 5 vs Hero 4 Silver comes down to the battery life. GoPro Hero 4 Silver is equipped with a 1160 mAh battery, whereas GoPro Hero 5 comes with a slightly more powerful battery with 1220 mAh capacity. However, there isn’t much improvement in the actual usage because the increased battery capacity is to serve the GPS function.

GoPro Hero 5GoPro Hero 4 Silver
Key features- Stunning 4K video and 12MP photos in Single, Burst and Time Lapse modes - Durable by design, HERO5 Black is waterproof to 33ft (10m) without a housing - Additional GoPro HERO5 Black Features + Benefits below on item page- Built-in touch display for easy camera control, shot-framing and playback - Professional 1080p60 and 720p120 video with 12MP photos at up to 30 frames per second - Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth support the GoPro App, Smart Remote and more

Customer Rating4.2 out of 5.0 stars4.4 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Since the two models are sold in the same price range, there is no doubt that GoPro Hero 5 is indeed a much better model. It has various advantages and improvements. It has a waterproof body, better display, better video performance, and a list of nice additional features such as the video stabilization and voice control.

Belkin Netcam Vs Dropcam Pro

Being able to monitor the condition of your home while you are away will give you a peace of mind. Sometimes, when you are on the go, you may get worried if there is a lamp that you forgot to turn off or if there is someone breaking in. However, you can now monitor your home remotely no matter where you are, thanks to Wi-Fi cameras! There are now some Wi-Fi camera models designed specifically for home monitoring purposes. Some of them that are the most popular are Belkin Netcam and Dropcam Pro. So, what is the difference between Belkin Netcam and Dropcam Pro? Find out below!

Belkin Netcam Vs Dropcam Pro

Both models are certainly compact and lightweight, but Dropcam Pro is a little bit more compact and more lightweight than Belkin Netcam. The less pronounced body will make it easier to place and to hide. Both models connect wirelessly to your smartphone and tablet, but they need to be plugged into a power outlet. Interestingly, both Belkin Netcam and Dropcam Pro also have similar image quality with 1280 x 720 resolution. However, Dropcam Pro has a wider field of view. It can capture a 130-degree wide view, whereas Belkin Netcam can only capture about 95 degrees. Dropcam Pro also allows up to 8x zoom, whereas Belkin Netcam is incapable of zooming. Both models also have integrated night vision filters that allow them to record visible views even in the dark.

Read also : Dropcam Pro vs Foscam.

Both Belkin Netcam and Dropcam Pro are without built-in storage. Instead, they upload their recording to cloud. Belkin Netcam has its own cloud service, but the cloud service is not encrypted. On the other hand, Dropcam Pro works with public cloud. Both models can record continuously, or you can also set them to record only when they detect movements. They will then send email alerts if they detect movements. Dropcam Pro can also send push notifications to your mobile gadget, which is perhaps more effective and practical.

On the other hand, Belkin Netcam can be worth considering if you use other WeMo products, like the WeMo Motion Sensor and WeMo Light Switch. This way, whenever you see an intruder getting into your home, you can immediately command your smart home system to turn on the lamps to scare them away!

Belkin Netcam Vs Dropcam Pro

Belkin NetcamDropcam Pro
Key features- Night vision filter: Lets you view more with little to no light - Secure connection: NetCam HD+ only connects to our secure servers - Not compatible with Amazon Echo- Stunning Video Quality: New optics and updated image sensor provide 2x sharper video - Stay Connected with Two-Way Talk, Intelligent Alerts, Scheduling and Mobile & Web apps

Customer Rating3.5 out of 5.0 stars3.9 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

If you want to make a smart home system with WeMo, Belkin Netcam is the way to go. The integration allows for easy and convenient control over your home. However, if you just need a reliable Wi-Fi monitor camera, then Dropcam Pro should be your choice.

Polaroid Z340 Vs Instax 210

Are you currently confused in choosing between Polaroid Z340 and Instax 210? Do you want to know how the two differ from each other? Both Polaroid Z340 and Instax 210 are indeed cameras that can instantly print your pictures right after you shoot. This capability is very handy and practical. You won’t have to connect either camera to a computer in order to print your photos. However, there are important differences between Polaroid Z340 and Instax 210 that you need to know before choosing. So, continue reading below!

Polaroid Z340 Vs Instax 210

Polaroid Z340 is significantly bigger and bulkier than Instax 210, so it may not be as portable. However, Polaroid Z340 is a digital camera. It captures the picture and saves the picture into a digital file. There is an SD/SDHC slot into which you can insert a memory card to function as a storage media for the image files. In addition, Polaroid Z340 has a 2.7” integrated LCD screen, through which you can directly view and crop your photographs. You can also share your pics directly from the camera.

On the other hand, Instax 210 is not a digital camera. It does not take memory cards, so there is no way to save the pics as digital files. It, however, has a much more compact body that is easy to handle. The big and clear viewfinder is great for framing control. There is an LCD control panel that displays the information regarding focal distance and film count. It also has a programmable electronic shutter, adjustable from 1/64 up to 1/200 seconds. An automatic flash functions automatically when in a low-light condition.

Polaroid Z340 has a resolution of 14 MP. The photo quality is decent, though not exactly astonishing. Nevertheless, it is very good for casual purposes. The pictures are quite detailed. The camera works with the Zink printing system, and is able to print 3” x 4” full-color photographs that are resistant to water, smudge, and tear. On the other hand, Instax 210 works with a film cartridge that supplies photo papers for immediate printing. This camera is able to print 3.4” x 4.25” photographs.

Polaroid Z340 Vs Instax 210

Polaroid Z340Instax 210
Key features- Snap, print, and share without using a computer - 3x4-inch full color photographs that are smudge-proof, water- and tear-resistant. - View and crop your images on the 2.7-inch LCD screen- LCD control panel displaying focal distance and film count - Programmed electronic shutter, 1/64-1/200 sec - Automatic flash for low-light shooting

Customer Rating4.1 out of 5.0 stars4.1 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

In general, Polaroid Z340 makes the best way to go. Being a digital camera, it has a wider range of functionality. The option to save pics into digital files is very useful. However, if you are just looking for a simple instant-print camera, Instax 210 is a feasible alternative.

Nikon Coolpix L840 Vs L340

Are you confused in choosing between Nikon Coolpix L340 and Nikon Coolpix L840? Well, you are not alone. Obviously, Nikon Coolpix L840 is the one that is more expensive, but Nikon Coolpix L340 actually offers an image sensor with a higher native resolution. Hence, you may wonder whether Nikon Coolpix L340 or Nikon Coolpix L840 which holds the fullest value for the money. Now, let us take a deeper look at the comparisons between the two products in order to determine which model to choose.


Design and Lens System
Nikon Coolpix L340 and Nikon Coolpix L840 actually look very similar to each other. Both are compact, lightweight, and portable digital cameras. Each has a textured gripping area on the side of the body, a 3.0-inch display screen, along with dial control buttons. However, Nikon Coolpix L840 is a thud bulkier and heavier than Nikon Coolpix L340. Howsoever, the difference is quite marginal and should not be a big issue.

You can also notice that Nikon Coolpix L840 has a slightly bigger lens than Nikon Coolpix L340. Now, this is one thing to consider. Nikon Coolpix L840 has a longer tele reach with a maximum optical zoom of 38x. Nikon Coolpix L340 only offers up to 28x optical zoom.

Performance and Output Quality
Despite coming from the same series, Nikon Coolpix L340 and Nikon Coolpix L840 come with different technologies. Nikon Coolpix L340 features a 20.0 MP 1/2.3” CCD image sensor, whilst Nikon Coolpix L840 comes with a 16.0 MP 1/2.3” CMOS image sensor. Besides having a higher native resolution, which allows the camera to produce larger, sharper, and more detailed images, CCD is also generally able to deliver fuller and more solid colors with less noise than CMOS. However, CMOS is more popular nowadays due to consuming significantly less power and the faster speed.

Furthermore, Nikon Coolpix L840 also has a higher maximum ISO than Nikon Coolpix L340. Nikon Coolpix L840 has an ISO range of 100-6400, whereas Nikon Coolpix L340 has an ISO range of only 80-1600. Nikon Coolpix L840 has a maximum shutter speed of 1/5000s and a photo burst speed of 7.4 fps. Nikon Coolpix L340 only has a maximum shutter speed of 1/1500s and a photo burst speed of 4.0 fps. For capturing the photos of moving objects, L840 is certainly more suitable than L340.

Nikon Coolpix L840 Vs L340

Nikon Coolpix L840Nikon Coolpix L340
Key features- 38x optical zoom telephoto lens with Vibration Reduction; 76x dynamic fine zoom - Low-light 16MP CMOS image sensor - 3.0-inch 921,000-dot Tilt LCD display - Full HD 1080p videos with stereo sound - Built-in Wi-Fi and Near Field Communication technology for instant sharing- 28x optical zoom, 56x Dynamic Fine Zooms - 20.2-MP CCD sensor for bright, sharp photos and HD videos - Frame coverage: Approx. 99% horizontal and vertical (compared to actual picture) - HD 720p videos with sound bring your memories to life

Customer Rating4.2 out of 5.0 stars4.3 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Nikon Coolpix L840 is the best way to go for general-purpose usage. The higher speed and higher zooming power allow the model to be more versatile for different purposes. It is also good for sports and other long-range photography. Nikon Coolpix L340, though having a higher resolution, is not as versatile.

Sony HDR-MV1 Vs Zoom Q8

In a previous article, we discussed about the comparisons between Sony HDR-MV1 and Zoom Q4. This time, however, we will discuss about Sony HDR-MV1 and Zoom Q8. These two products are popular video recorders on the market, available in a similar price range. Well, indeed, Zoom Q8 is a higher model than Zoom Q4, and happens to be slightly more expensive than Sony HDR-MV1. So, should you go with Sony HDR-MV1 or Zoom Q8? Let us see below!


Sony HDR-MV1
Sony HDR-MV1 is a video recorder that comes with a unique and distinctive design. It is very compact and slim and lightweight, allowing you to handle it conveniently in a single hand. Apparently, Sony HDR-MV1 is made for right-handed people, because the touchscreen display is placed on the left side of the body. This way, you can only peek at the display screen if you hold it in your right hand. The button layout is intuitive, allowing for easy reach. Sony HDR-MV1 is able to record high-quality 1920×1080/30p Full HD videos with selectable LPCM or AAC audio format. In LPCM, the audio quality is 16-bit/44.1kHz, while in AAC, the maximum quality is 128kbps/48kHz. Sony HDR-MV1 is armed with a 120-degree Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessa lens and a pair of stereo mics, having a battery life of up to 3.5 hours per charge.

Zoom Q8
On the other hand, Zoom Q8 is a video recorder that features a detachable, rotatable full-color LCD touchscreen. The adjustable screen makes it very flexible and versatile for different shooting positions. You can record videos from a tricky angle while still being able to see the preview. You can remove the display, too, if you wish to have a live preview on your computer device via USB instead. Not only the display, but also the mics are detachable. The included ones, XYQ-8 stereo X/Y mics, work well, but you can remove them and install another pair of Zoom mic capsules as an upgrade. Zoom Q8 is able to record with up to four tracks of simultaneous audio recording, while the maximum video quality is 2304 x 1296 (3M HD). In addition, Zoom Q8 also features a high-quality 160-degree wide angle lens with selectable viewing angles.

Sony HDR-MV1 Vs Zoom Q8

Sony HDR-MV1Zoom Q8
Key features- Powerful LPCM and AAC for recording versatility - Capture wide stereo sound with 120 Degree X/Y mic - High-quality 30p HD video with low grain in low light- Support for five HD video modes, up to 2304 x 1296 pixels (3M HD), as well as two WVGA modes - Compatible with all Zoom microphone capsules (sold separately) - Up to four tracks of simultaneous audio recording

Customer Rating3.6 out of 5.0 stars4.0 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave 13% Please click here

Even though Sony HDR-MV1 is indeed a good bang for the bucks, Zoom Q8 comes with better recording quality, as well as extensive customizability. The extra features are worth the price increment. Therefore, you should go with Zoom Q8!

Canon Vixia HF R500 Vs R600

Who doesn’t know Canon? The brand is known worldwide for a wide variety of products. A lot of people trust the company and regard Canon’s models as high-quality. Hence, indeed, you make no mistake in considering to get a Canon model for your portable digital camcorder. However, you may get confused in choosing between Canon Vixia HF R500 and Canon Vixia HF R600. The two seem to be extremely identical to each other. Yet, they are being priced quite differently on the market. More often than not, Canon Vixia HF R600 is pricier than Canon Vixia HF R500. So, which one should you get? Find the answer below!


Extremely Similar Models
If you try to perform a thorough comparison between Canon Vixia HF R500 and Canon Vixia HF R600, you are going to have a hard time. Canon Vixia HF R500 and Canon Vixia HF R600 do share not only similar looks, but also similar specifications and features. They are roughly of the same size, though Canon Vixia HF R600 is a tiny bit bulkier to the sides than Canon Vixia HF R500 by 0.1 inches. They are also of the same weight. Each of them operates using a rechargeable lithium-ion BP-718 battery, which has a capacity of 1840 mAh.

Each of them is armed by a 3.28 MP 1/4.85” CMOS image sensor and the DIGIC DV 4 image processor. The combination is very powerful; these digital camcorders are able to record excellent videos in Full HD 1080p quality at 60fps frame rate. The image is sharp and detailed, with full, solid colors. The lens system is also very powerful; they are able to provide up to 57x advanced optical zoom! The Super Range Optical Image Stabilizer ensures high-quality imaging even at extreme zoom levels. If you need even more zooming power, they also have digital zooming of 1140x maximum, though, of course, digital zooming causes the image to blur. They each has a 3” touchscreen LCD for control. (Read also: Sony HDR-MV1 Vs Zoom Q4)

Slightly Improved Battery Life
With all these similarities, we can then conclude that Canon Vixia HF R600 is basically just a rebranded Canon Vixia HF R500. However, it is worth a note that Canon Vixia HF R600 has a slightly better battery life than Canon Vixia HF R500. Canon Vixia HF R600 can last roughly one hour longer than Canon Vixia HF R500 in continuous usage.

Canon Vixia HF R500 Vs R600

Canon Vixia HF R500Canon Vixia HF R600
Key features- 3.28 megapixel 1080p full HD CMOS sensor with DIGIC DV 4 image processor - 57x advanced zoom and Super Range Optical Image Stabilizer - 3-inch capacitive touch panel LCD offers fast, easy, intuitive controls - High capacity battery pack ensures extended shooting time - Features include Advanced baby mode, Audio Scene Select, Smart AUTO, Cinema-Look filter effects and Video Snapshot- 57x (32.5-1853mm) Advanced Zoom and SuperRange Optical Image Stabilizer helps provide outstanding, steady video - Canon 3.28 Megapixel Full HD CMOS Image Sensor - DIGIC DV 4 Image Processor captures video at 1920 x 1080 resolution - 1080/60p recording in MP4 (35 Mbps) and AVCHD Progressive (28 Mbps) helps ensure high quality capture of moving subjects - 3.0-inch capacitive touch panel LCD offers fast, easy and intuitive controls

check here

check here

Customer Rating4.4 out of 5.0 stars4.5 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave 20% Please click here

Considering that the price difference between the two models is quite considerable, the slightly extended battery life may not be a very attractive offer. Therefore, coming with similar functionality, performance, and output quality, Canon Vixia HF R500 makes the fullest value for the money.

Sony HDR-MV1 Vs Zoom Q4

Are you looking for the best portable video recorder? You may have met Sony HDR-MV1 and Zoom Q4, and you are now considering to get either one of them. Sony HDR-MV1 and Zoom Q4 share several similarities in the offered features. Even so, there are certainly differences and distinctions that may make you prefer one over the other. Besides, between the two products, Sony HDR-MV1 is a little bit pricier than Zoom Q4. So, which one should you choose?


As portable video recorders, both Sony HDR-MV1 and Zoom Q4 are indeed very compact and lightweight. Both can be handled easily with a single hand. However, they have quite distinctive designs. Sony HDR-MV1 comes with a very slim body with its touchscreen display fixed on the left side of the body. This way, it becomes extremely compact that you can easily slip it into your pocket. On the downside, such design makes it a little bit tricky to see the display screen while you shoot. Not that difficult, though, since the left side is the one that faces you if you hold the recorder with your right hand. Just need some time to get used to. The buttons are laid out conveniently for easy reach and access, while the pair of stereo mics is placed on the front side, right under the lens. The angle between the mics matches the 120-degree extra-wide lens, ensuring that the captured audio sounds natural and accurate to the captured images. (Take a look: Sony HDR-MV1 Vs Zoom Q8)

On the other hand, Zoom Q4 is relatively bulkier. It features a detachable and tiltable display screen, while the pair of stereo mics is placed on the rear. Since the mics are placed a little bit further away from the source of the sounds, such design may result in low audio levels. Zoom Q4 is armed with an ultra-wide 130-degree lens.

Feature and Performance
Both models record in a maximum video quality of Full HD 1920 x 1080 at 30 fps frame rate. Even so, Sony HDR-MV1 delivers better color reproduction. It also has better performance in low-light conditions, as it has very low amount of grain and noise.

Sony HDR-MV1 has the Audio Lip Sync function that ensures synchronized audio with the video. In addition, Sony HDR-MV1 comes with built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy file sharing.

Sony HDR-MV1 Vs Zoom Q4

Sony HDR-MV1Zoom Q4
Key features- Powerful LPCM and AAC for recording versatility - Capture wide stereo sound with 120 Degree X/Y mic - High-quality 30p HD video with low grain in low light- HD video resolutions up to 1080p (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264) - Capture more with 130-degree wide angle lens - Live-streaming function with HD video

Customer Rating3.6 out of 5.0 stars3.6 out of 5.0 stars
Best OfferSave Money Please click hereSave Money Please click here

Between these two products, we recommend you to choose Sony HDR-MV1. The image quality is better, while the Audio Lip Sync function ensures synchronized A/V all the time. Plus, it already has Wi-Fi and NFC!